South Africa’s R1 trillion franchise sector faces its most comprehensive regulatory examination yet. Moreover, the franchise market inquiry impact will reach automotive and fleet-related franchises directly. TimesLive reports that the Competition Commission has published draft terms of reference for a market inquiry. It will probe whether franchisors exploit their dominance and squeeze franchisees. The sector under review generates close to R1 trillion in annual turnover, around 15% of GDP. It supports roughly 500,000 jobs. Importantly, automotive services sit explicitly within the inquiry’s scope. Consequently, every franchise-model business in the fleet and vehicle-services space should understand what is coming.
Transparency note: DigitFMS, which publishes this news service, itself operates a franchise model in the fleet-technology sector. This article reports the inquiry factually from cited sources. Readers considering any franchise should consult the Commission’s official documents and take independent advice.
Specifically, this analysis covers what the inquiry will examine and the concerns that prompted it. It then sets out the timeline, the automotive and fleet dimension, and what franchisees and franchisors should do now.
Inside the Scope of the Franchise Market Inquiry Impact
Notably, the draft terms of reference set out a wide-ranging examination. They were published on 26 June under section 43B(1)(a) of the Competition Act.
Sector numbers behind the franchise market inquiry impact
The scale explains the attention. According to the draft terms of reference, the sector comprises more than 800 franchisor brands. Beyond them sit over 3,500 franchisees and approximately 30,000 outlets. Estimated turnover for 2023 reached nearly R1 trillion, representing about 15% of GDP. Furthermore, franchising accounts for roughly 5% of total employment, supporting about 500,000 jobs. Consequently, the inquiry touches one of the largest commercial ecosystems in the country. Few sectors combine this economic weight with so little prior regulatory examination. That is precisely why legal commentators describe the moment as significant.
Three themes driving the franchise market inquiry impact
Importantly, the inquiry focuses on three principal themes. First, funding and finance requirements, including upfront capital contributions that may block small entrants. Second, franchise agreements and commercial practices, covering contract terms, procurement rules and pricing controls. Third, information asymmetries between franchisors and franchisees, where one side knows far more than the other before signing. Together, these themes address the full life cycle of a franchise relationship. They run from the decision to buy, through the operating years, to renewal or exit. Accordingly, the inquiry’s findings could reshape standard practice at every stage.
Which sectors fall inside the franchise market inquiry impact
The net is wide. Sectors identified include fast food and restaurants, retail, construction, and health and beauty. Grocery stores and the convenience outlets at fuel-station forecourts also appear. Crucially for this audience, automotive services appear explicitly in scope. That category spans fitment centres, service workshops, parts retailers and vehicle-technology dealerships, many of which operate on franchise models. Therefore, businesses across the fleet and vehicle-services value chain fall within the inquiry’s reach, whether franchisor or franchisee. They should follow its progress closely rather than assume it concerns only fast food and retail.
The Concerns Prompting the Franchise Market Inquiry Impact
Every market inquiry starts with a hypothesis. Here, the Commission has set out its preliminary concerns clearly, and they deserve straight reporting.
Power imbalances at the core of the franchise market inquiry impact
Central to the inquiry is the balance of power between franchisors and franchisees. The Commission says it has received complaints over several years alleging that agreements are routinely offered on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. Additionally, complaints describe franchisors exerting control through contracts, procurement rules and pricing. These controls allegedly leave franchisees little room to negotiate or adapt. Whether these practices restrict competition is exactly what the inquiry must determine. At this stage they remain allegations and preliminary views, not findings. The process will test them against evidence from all sides.
Transformation questions within the franchise market inquiry impact
Equally, the inquiry is anchored in the public-interest objectives of the Competition Act. Industry figures cited by the regulator show white entrepreneurs own 57% of franchise outlets. Africans own 18%, Indians 17% and coloured entrepreneurs 8%. Accordingly, the Commission will assess whether funding requirements, upfront costs and other structural features act as barriers. Its focus falls on small enterprises and historically disadvantaged persons. The stated goal is a sector whose ownership better reflects the country it serves. Consequently, the inquiry will test which features of the current model stand in the way.
Concentration concerns behind the franchise market inquiry impact
Merger activity adds a further dimension. Between 2017 and 2024, the Commission assessed 41 acquisitions involving grocery retail and food franchise businesses. Dealmaking accelerated after the pandemic. Consequently, the regulator is concerned that concentration in established franchise sectors may be rising. Rising concentration reduces the competitive pressure that protects both franchisees and consumers. While those figures come from grocery and food services, the concern about concentration applies across categories. The inquiry will examine whether ownership of brands and supply chains is narrowing in ways that harm competition.
The Fleet Dimension of the Franchise Market Inquiry Impact
For this publication’s audience, the automotive-services inclusion is the headline. Fleet-adjacent franchising is a substantial, often overlooked part of the sector.
Why automotive services sit inside the franchise market inquiry impact
Vehicle-related franchising runs deep in South Africa. Fitment centres, tyre and exhaust outlets, service workshops, parts retailers and vehicle-technology dealerships commonly operate as franchises or dealer networks. Moreover, the fleet-management industry itself uses franchise and dealer models to provide regional installation, support and sales coverage. Consequently, the inquiry’s questions about agreement terms, procurement obligations, territorial rights and disclosure apply directly to the vehicle-services value chain. Fleet operators may not feel the inquiry directly. However, the businesses that fit, service and support their vehicles very likely will.
What franchisees should watch in the franchise market inquiry impact
For franchisees, the inquiry is primarily an opportunity. The Commission has flagged the exact issues franchisees most often raise. These include one-sided agreements, compulsory procurement, pricing control and thin pre-sale disclosure. Once participation guidelines publish, franchisees with direct experience can make submissions, confidentially where necessary. Furthermore, previous market inquiries produced binding remedies and real structural change, so participation carries genuine weight. Franchisees in automotive and fleet-related categories should document their experiences now and review their agreements. Then they can contribute evidence rather than watching from the sidelines.
What franchisors face under the franchise market inquiry impact
Franchisors, meanwhile, should prepare for scrutiny. Werksmans Attorneys warns that franchise businesses should not underestimate the potential consequences. Far-reaching remedies flowed from earlier market inquiries. Sensible preparation starts with reviewing agreements for terms a regulator could view as restrictive. It continues with auditing disclosure documents for completeness, and documenting the commercial justification for fees, procurement rules and territorial terms. Notably, franchisors that already run transparent and fair models have the least to fear. They also have the most to gain from a process that raises standards across the sector.
Timeline and Reaction: How the Franchise Market Inquiry Impact Unfolds
The process now follows a defined statutory path, and the industry has begun responding publicly.
Key dates shaping the franchise market inquiry impact
Public comments on the draft terms of reference close at 4pm on 7 August 2026. Thereafter, the Commission reviews submissions and publishes final terms of reference. The inquiry formally commences 20 business days after that publication, and the Competition Act requires completion within 18 months. On completion, the Commission publishes a report in the Government Gazette. It then submits findings to the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition. However, legal commentators, including the Werksmans team, consider the 18-month deadline ambitious. The inquiry touches a wide breadth of business activities and market players.
Industry reaction to the franchise market inquiry impact
Early reaction has been notably constructive. Freddy Makgato, CEO of the Franchise Association of South Africa, responded first. He said members already abide by current legislation, including the Consumer Protection Act. Interestingly, he suggested the inquiry might help with the harder problem. Franchisors outside the association lie beyond FASA’s reach when complaints arrive. Makgato indicated the association may even propose reforms requiring all franchise operators to become members, enabling review of their agreements. Consequently, parts of the established industry appear to see the inquiry as a chance to raise standards. It reads as an opening rather than a threat.
Where This Publication Stands on the Franchise Market Inquiry Impact
Candour matters here, so we repeat the disclosure. DigitFMS operates a franchise model in the fleet-technology sector. Its regional franchises install and support vehicle-tracking, fuel-monitoring and fleet-camera systems. This article therefore reports on an inquiry whose scope could touch our own industry category. Readers should weigh that context, verify details against the Commission’s official documents, and treat this piece as reporting, not advice. Prospective franchisees of any brand, ours included, should study disclosure documents carefully. Independent legal and financial advice belongs in every decision before committing.
Equally, the principle the inquiry tests applies to everyone in the space. Cartrack, Tracker, Netstar, Ctrack and MiX by Powerfleet operate in the same space. Each runs dealer, fitment and distribution networks across the vehicle-technology sector. A process that clarifies fair franchising standards, improves disclosure and strengthens franchisee rights would apply across the industry evenly. Ultimately, transparent operators across the sector share an interest in an outcome that makes fair dealing the enforced norm. Trust in the franchise model itself sustains every network built on it.
Outlook: The Franchise Market Inquiry Impact Rewards the Transparent
The inquiry will take time. Comments close in August, and the final terms follow. The statutory clock then runs for 18 months, a deadline experts already call ambitious. Meanwhile, business continues. Franchises will change hands, agreements will renew, and networks will expand, all under a regulator’s gaze. For a sector representing 15% of GDP, that attention marks a structural shift in how franchising will operate. It echoes the broader regulatory reshaping already underway in logistics and rail.
However, the direction of travel is clear, and it favours the prepared. Franchisors with fair agreements, honest disclosure and defensible commercial terms will navigate the process comfortably. Franchisees gain a forum where their experience carries regulatory weight. Additionally, prospective franchise buyers, including those considering automotive and fleet-technology opportunities, benefit from a market where standards are examined openly. The uncomfortable questions land hardest on operators whose models depend on information gaps and one-sided terms. That is precisely the point of asking them.
Ultimately, the franchise market inquiry impact will be judged by what changes on the ground. That means fairer agreements, clearer disclosure, broader ownership and stronger small businesses. Those outcomes serve franchisees, franchisors and the customers both serve. The fleet and automotive-services corner of the franchise world should engage with the process rather than watch it pass. Submissions close on 7 August. The businesses that participate, prepare and hold themselves to the inquiry’s standard will emerge stronger. That holds whatever the final report concludes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the franchise market inquiry?
On 26 June 2026, the Competition Commission published draft terms of reference for a market inquiry into South Africa’s franchise sector. It acted under section 43B(1)(a) of the Competition Act. The Commission believes certain market features may impede, distort or restrict competition. The sector covers more than 800 franchisor brands, over 3,500 franchisees and roughly 30,000 outlets. It turns over close to R1 trillion and supports about 500,000 jobs.
Why did the Competition Commission launch the inquiry?
The Commission cites complaints received over years alleging take-it-or-leave-it agreements, with franchisors exerting control through contracts, procurement rules and pricing. It also notes low participation by small enterprises and historically disadvantaged persons. Cited ownership sits at 57% white, 18% African, 17% Indian and 8% coloured. Additionally, it observed rising concentration, having assessed 41 grocery and food franchise acquisitions between 2017 and 2024.
Which sectors fall within the inquiry scope?
The draft terms of reference identify fast food and restaurants, retail, automotive services, and construction. Health and beauty, grocery stores, and convenience outlets at fuel stations complete the list. Automotive services matter directly for the fleet industry, because fitment centres, service workshops and vehicle-technology dealerships operate within that category. Any franchise-model business in these sectors should follow the inquiry closely.
What are the key dates for the franchise inquiry?
Public comments on the draft terms close at 4pm on 7 August 2026. The Commission then publishes final terms of reference. The inquiry commences 20 business days after that publication, with completion required within 18 months. Afterwards, the Commission publishes a report in the Government Gazette. Findings go to the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition. Commentators consider the timeline ambitious.
What does the inquiry mean for franchisees?
For franchisees, it is an opportunity to be heard. The Commission has flagged power imbalances, restrictive agreements, procurement obligations and information asymmetries as areas of interest. Franchisees with direct experience can make submissions once participation guidelines publish. Previous market inquiries produced binding remedies and structural change. So the process could genuinely improve franchisee rights and access to information.
What does the inquiry mean for franchisors?
Franchisors should prepare for scrutiny. Werksmans Attorneys warns businesses not to underestimate potential consequences, given the far-reaching remedies from previous inquiries. Preparation includes reviewing agreements for restrictive terms and auditing disclosure for completeness. Documenting the justification for fees, procurement rules and territorial terms also helps. Transparent, fair franchisors are best positioned for the process and its outcomes.
How can businesses participate in the inquiry?
Written comments on the draft terms are due by 4pm on 7 August 2026. Submissions go via the channels in the Government Gazette notice. After the final terms publish, the Commission will release participation guidelines on its website. Franchisors, franchisees, industry bodies, funders and suppliers can all take part. Businesses with a direct stake should consider competition-law advice before making submissions.
Sources
TimesLive — “Franchise probe could mean ‘big shift'”, 4 July 2026; R1 trillion turnover, 15% of GDP, 500,000 jobs, 800 brands, 3,500 franchisees, 30,000 outlets, ownership 57% white / 18% African / 17% Indian / 8% coloured, three themes, take-it-or-leave-it complaints, 41 acquisitions 2017–2024, Werksmans “significant shift” warning, FASA CEO Freddy Makgato comments · Werksmans Attorneys — “Franchisors Beware! The Competition Commission may come knocking soon”, 1 July 2026; draft ToR 26 June, section 43B(1)(a), sector categories including fuel-station outlets, comment deadline 7 August, 20-business-day commencement, 18-month completion
Bowmans via Bizcommunity — “CompComm to launch inquiry into franchise market”, 2 July 2026; 2023 turnover ~15% of GDP, ~5% of employment, statutory process, report to Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition · eNCA — “Competition Commission to probe SA franchise industry”; concentration of ownership, unequal bargaining power, restrictive trading conditions, funding barriers · Competition Commission — draft Terms of Reference, Government Gazette, 26 June 2026
DigitFMS — freight rail reform fleet road operators (3 July), port congestion fleet costs Richards Bay (26 June); the regulatory reshaping of South African logistics and commerce. Note: this article reports a regulatory process at its draft-terms stage; no findings have been made against any business. DigitFMS operates a franchise model within the sector category discussed. This is general information, not legal or financial advice.
© 2026 DigitFMS. All rights reserved.